2022-AUG-08 Info: Please get acquainted with updates to the Rule Book(s).

MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

recurrence: on occasion (if audio material is available, 2 times a year max)
User avatar
Ungifted
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 11:19 CEST
Location: Hamburg

Re: MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

#51

Post by Ungifted »

davemcisaac wrote:
Tue Jan 23, 2018 08:00 CET
Looked again! Anybody here? :headscratch:
:whiteflag: I'm here, every day.
But I think, non of our masterings were good enough and Mr. Fox won't break our hearts and tell us this bitter truth.
Waleed Morris
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2017 15:42 CEST

Re: MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

#52

Post by Waleed Morris »

Ungifted wrote:
Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:49 CET
davemcisaac wrote:
Tue Jan 23, 2018 08:00 CET
Looked again! Anybody here? :headscratch:
Same here !!
User avatar
Mange
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2017 07:21 CET
Location: Sweden

Re: MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

#53

Post by Mange »

Same here. Almost every day. At least I know now that notifications work for the thread.
User avatar
Jorgeelalto
Song Provider
Song Provider
Posts: 97
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 00:41 CEST
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

#54

Post by Jorgeelalto »

I'm not mad (and not saying that you're mad guys :D ), he may have got a flu or worse (there's something around Europe that's kicking lots of asses), he may have personal problems, or he is just exhausted from all of this.
User avatar
Mister Fox
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2526
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 16:15 CEST
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

#55

Post by Mister Fox »

Sorry for the radio silence guys - you'll be updated ASAP
User avatar
Dodgingrain
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 03:16 CEST
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

#56

Post by Dodgingrain »

lol, I should try that notification thing vs. checking the thread over and over.... :face:
Mixing, Mastering, Remixing Services
Two Cat Audio Labs, llc
https://www.twocataudiolabs.com
https://www.instagram.com/twocataudiolabs/
User avatar
Mange
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2017 07:21 CET
Location: Sweden

Re: MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

#57

Post by Mange »

this series is very good I think. the first maybe 10 episodes is preferably liten to in order. Will listen to this last episode this nightshift. I very much do not understand why we should aim for -14LUFS, curious why Ian feels the same.

http://themasteringshow.com/episode-44/
HerbFelho
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 13:15 CEST
Location: Munich

Re: MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

#58

Post by HerbFelho »

this series is very good I think. the first maybe 10 episodes is preferably liten to in order. Will listen to this last episode this nightshift. I very much do not understand why we should aim for -14LUFS, curious why Ian feels the same.

http://themasteringshow.com/episode-44/
yes, this is a great podcast, think I didn´t miss an episode.

About the -14 LUFS thing Ian is basically saying that since this is the level to which many streaming platforms like spotify loudness normalize the tracks to now many engineers tend to normalize all of their tracks to exactly -14 LUFS which is not always a good idea.

For example when you have a ballad like "stairway to heaven" with a long and quiet intro and a track like "back in black" rockin out at pretty much the same level from beginning to end and put these two on an album next to each other. What would happen when you normalize both to -14 LUFS is that the end part of "stairway" would be much louder than "back in black" which would be a weird to listen to and could probably be called a mastering-mistake. So we still should keep in mind what fits musically, especially when mastering for an album.

It may be not that much of a topic for a single song and aiming for -14 LUFS is certainly a good guideline. And certainly better than squashing your tracks like back in the day where the loudness war was in full swing provided that you use the now available full headroom / dynamic range of course.
But still the musical style should be kept in mind. A very dynamic jazz track for example would probably feel too constricted at -14 LUFS and -16 or -18 LUFS could be more appropriate here.
Coiled_Ear
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2017 18:50 CEST

Re: MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

#59

Post by Coiled_Ear »

So, two monts have passed...still no answer?
kevin gobin
Wild Card x1
Wild Card x1
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 16:53 CEST
Location: Indian Ocean

Re: MASTERING CHALLENGE - MastC001 December 2017 - in evaluation

#60

Post by kevin gobin »

What a great delay plugin! lol
Post Reply